From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Mar 14 18: 2:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from hades.riverstyx.net (unknown [216.94.42.239]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB301537E for ; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 18:02:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from unknown@riverstyx.net) Received: from localhost (unknown@localhost) by hades.riverstyx.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA18223; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 18:03:42 -0800 Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 18:03:42 -0800 (PST) From: To: Dan Langille Cc: joseph@randomnetworks.com, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, de-bsd-chat@DE.FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.1 SMP outperforms SuSE 6.0 SMP by factor 2.3 !!! In-Reply-To: <19990315014709.EAPS682101.mta1-rme@wocker> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Not to get all competitive here, but the 2.2 series is the new stable kernel now. 2.3 is the new development kernel. It's hardly fair to run the latest FreeBSD against an old Linux kernel. On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Dan Langille wrote: > > Would it be possible for you to run the same tests with the 2.2 > > kernel? I would think that regardless of the label ( "stable", "current", > > etc ) the 2.2 kernel would be the one most people would put up against > > FBSD 3.1 > FWIW the first thing someone mentioned to me was the tests were against > Linux 2.0 kernel... > Those were people who don't use FreeBSD. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message