From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Mar 19 19:59:43 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA13554 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 19:59:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.213.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA13508 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 19:59:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@sdf.com) Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #3) id 0yFsb8-0001JZ-00; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 19:35:58 -0800 Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 19:35:58 -0800 (PST) From: Tom To: "Lee Crites (AEI)" cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Majordomo results: who (fwd) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 19 Mar 1998, Lee Crites (AEI) wrote: This doesn't belong on freebsd-hackers. Moved to chat. > I got a message which said to check with so-and-so about some > fbsd information. "No problem," I think, "I'll just ask > majordomo for the addresses and send him an email." Why would you do that? Every thinking admin turns WHO off on Majordomo anyhow. Besides, it isn't guarrenteed to have real names so that you can match "so-and-so" with an address on freebsd-hackers. If it is FreeBSD developer, you are probably better off using finger against freebsd.org Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message