From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 20 14:07:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E77106564A for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:07:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (lev.vlakno.cz [77.93.215.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200B58FC14 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:07:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C569CB0E4; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:04:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 47Cf8LjgpmtE; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:04:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A7B9CB0F4; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:04:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o3KE4iIf068383; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:04:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:04:44 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: Dimitry Andric Message-ID: <20100420140444.GA68252@freebsd.org> References: <20100416160818.GA69460@freebsd.org> <4BC9E9D2.1040505@andric.com> <20100417173321.GA46116@freebsd.org> <4BC9FA7D.4060108@andric.com> <20100417181302.GA50462@freebsd.org> <4BCDB475.6060609@andric.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BCDB475.6060609@andric.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT]: ClangBSD is selfhosting, we need testers now X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:07:09 -0000 On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 04:04:37PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2010-04-17 20:13, Roman Divacky wrote: > >>>>I'm using the llvm-devel-2.7.r100430 port. > >> > >>This is the current devel/llvm-devel port, AFAICS? The system itself > >>runs -CURRENT as of r206706. > > > >sorry.. havent noticed that you wrote that in your first mail > > > >yes, i386 has a problem. I am just distilling the testcase and > >I guess it will be fixed in upstream LLVM in a couple of hours. > > Tried again with llvm r101891, still the same error... the problem is that gcc miscompiles llvm at -O3, I havent managed to contact brooks@ to change the port to default to -O2 you can do that locally I guess