Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 11:57:00 +0930 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Graham Wheeler <gram@cdsec.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Using select() to implement a delay Message-ID: <XFMail.990421115700.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199904200921.LAA09941@cdsec.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20-Apr-99 Graham Wheeler wrote: > I am using this both because it gives better resolution than sleep(), > and also because it doesn't require the use of SIGALRM, which I am > using elsewhere. What about usleep()? Although it can return EINTR too, so I suppose you only save about 2 lines of code :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.990421115700.doconnor>