From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 18 10:39:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FEC16A4CE; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:39:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E24843D54; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:39:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])j2IAdGvh006009; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:39:16 +0200 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) j2IAR9Qi000861; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:27:09 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost)j2IAR90j000860; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:27:09 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:27:09 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Denis Peplin Message-ID: <20050318102709.GA820@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <200503171036.j2HAaD6k065237@repoman.freebsd.org> <42399518.4070606@FreeBSD.org> <20050317170644.GA73267@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20050317171105.GE1889@submonkey.net> <20050317145409.594d9247@mobile.pittgoth.com> <423A714C.3070408@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <423A714C.3070408@FreeBSD.org> cc: Tom Rhodes cc: Ceri Davies cc: doc-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-servers chapter.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:39:50 -0000 On 2005-03-18 09:12, Denis Peplin wrote: >Tom Rhodes wrote: >> apachectl graceful should read the new config without actually >> restarting httpd. I avoided using 'start' to avoid that 'already >> running' issue. > > What about second part of the patch (mysql support vs mysql > support in php)? In my opinion, that part looked fine. After all, it does describe the facts better. It's not Apache that supports MySQL. PHP is the module that allows access to it.