From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 26 19:11:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF4037B401 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 19:11:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from white.imgsrc.co.jp (ns.imgsrc.co.jp [210.226.20.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A16B143F93 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 19:11:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by white.imgsrc.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12487425F for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:11:56 +0900 (JST) Received: from black.imgsrc.co.jp (black.imgsrc.co.jp [2001:218:422:2::130]) by white.imgsrc.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3F1425C for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:11:55 +0900 (JST) Received: from black.imgsrc.co.jp (black.imgsrc.co.jp [2001:218:422:2::130]) by black.imgsrc.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A761E4622 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:11:55 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:11:55 +0900 Message-ID: <7m7k7846c4.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> From: Jun Kuriyama To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20030627012704.GA22213@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <20030626222736.GB18007@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <7mbrwk48nm.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> <20030627012704.GA22213@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.0 (Venus) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.4 Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020531 Subject: Re: DNS - Summary? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 02:11:57 -0000 At Thu, 26 Jun 2003 21:27:04 -0400, Ken Smith wrote: > That also explains why you thought the site admin contacts and PGP > list thing was a good idea. I was afraid of it because I thought > it meant dnsadm@ had to keep the table for every site. If we break > it up this way they probably don't - they only need to communicate > with any site in the TLD and the people who have taken responsibility > for a delegated zone. Much smaller list to deal with. The zone > admins will need to keep their own lists but those also should be > managable. I don't think every country should should maintain their CC domain space. If that country requires to maintain too much sites, delegation seems good way. But if they has only one ftp and one cvsup mirrors, passing this to dnsadm@FreeBSD.org would reduce unstability of our DNS (just IMHO). We need to update mirror site listing of the Handbook and need to know that change request is authorized or not. To achieve this, at least CC DNS operator's PGP key list is required. And, as described (4) in your mail, we need to maintain {ftp,cvsup,www}*.FreeBSD.org name list to point somewhere. Change request of that information should be signed, shouldn't be? -- Jun Kuriyama // IMG SRC, Inc. // FreeBSD Project