Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 19:01:10 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Pritchard <mpp@mpp.pro-ns.net> To: phantom@cris.net (Alexey M. Zelkin) Cc: doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BSD $2 Message-ID: <199908190001.TAA27390@mpp.pro-ns.net> In-Reply-To: <199908182223.CAA05664@scorpion.crimea.ua> from "Alexey M. Zelkin" at "Aug 19, 1999 02:23:57 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> We have restriction that ".Os" macro with $1 == BSD will > has required second parameter, i.e. 3, 4, 4.4. But > I just have a question -- which value will have .Os > macro as first/second parameter when driver developed for NetBSD > and imported to FreeBSD ? > > I think better way is BSD without second parameter. > > PS: Example is en.4 I think that the only man pages that should be specifiying "BSD" with the .Os macro are those the came from 4.4BSD-Lite[12]. en.4 should have either specified FreeBSD or just called .Os with no parameters when it was created. We currently have a number of man pages in the system that specify ".Os NetBSD". We have been inconsistent in the past how we have imported these. Sometimes we leave the NetBSD attribution, sometimes we change it to FreeBSD, and sometimes we just change it to not specify an operating system (which pretty much amounts to the same thing as changing it to FreeBSD). -Mike -- Mike Pritchard mpp@FreeBSD.ORG or mpp@mpp.pro-ns.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908190001.TAA27390>