From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 28 18:15:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9023916A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:15:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C100143DAC for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:13:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.localdomain (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439FD5199A for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:13:13 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:13:10 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061128175842.23797.qmail@web57807.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <456C7A08.8060908@joeholden.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <456C7A08.8060908@joeholden.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611281813.10527.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Subject: Re: Zope Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:15:41 -0000 On Tuesday 28 November 2006 18:03, Joe Holden wrote: > Rachel Florentine wrote: > > 7676Hi; > > Went to build Zope3 from port and got this error: > > > > ===> zope-3.3.0 has known vulnerabilities: > > => zope -- restructuredText "csv_table" Information Disclosure. > > Reference: > > >292.html> => Please update your ports tree and try again. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/zope3. > > > > So I ran "portsnap fetch" and "portsnap update" and tried again. Same > > error. What's up? TIA, > > Rachel > > It's been marked as vulnerable, you could remove portaudit and install > anyway. > DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes is less drastic