From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Apr 26 0:42:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7017137B74C for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 00:42:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA07159 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 09:42:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id JAA03079 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 09:42:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from overcee.netplex.com.au (peter1.yahoo.com [208.48.107.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3DA37BB1A; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 00:41:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFD31CE1; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 00:41:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Greg Lehey Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Chuck Robey , Robert Watson , FreeBSD Committers Subject: Re: How about building modules along with the kernel? (was: cvs commit: src/sys/modules/syscons/fire fire_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/rain rain_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/warp warp_saver.c) In-Reply-To: Message from Greg Lehey of "Wed, 26 Apr 2000 16:48:24 +0930." <20000426164824.D43932@freebie.lemis.com> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 00:41:55 -0700 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20000426074155.4FFD31CE1@overcee.netplex.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greg Lehey wrote: > On Tuesday, 25 April 2000 at 23:40:16 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 11:48:27PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: > >> Tell you what. Let the discussion carry on. If there's no movement by > >> Friday, I'll stick the offer back up. I just want to insure that it > >> doesn't die (again) by being stuck onto a proposal for too grand a design. > > > > The discussion should be moved to freebsd-arch then. > > > > FOLLOWS UP DIRECTED THERE. PLEASE *REMOVE* cvs-all & cvs-committers from > > this thread. > > In theory, that's all well and good. But look what wc -l tells me: > > 679 cvs-all > 1739 freebsd-current > 481 freebsd-arch > > cvs-all doesn't appear to be a real mailing list, be we all know that > there are about 200 people there. That means nearly 900 people on the > (mutually exclusive) cvs lists, at least another 800 over in -current, > less than 500 in -arch. You can't force a committer to join -arch, > which is why I still prefer -committers. cvs-all is the majordomo public list. cvs-committers is a synthetic list where the recipients are generated from CVSROOT/access on the fly for each message. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message