From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 05:33:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018E816A4CF; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 05:33:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A3F43D31; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 05:33:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804B1654EF; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 13:33:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 39397-02-3; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 13:33:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from saboteur.dek.spc.org (82-147-17-88.dsl.uk.rapidplay.com [82.147.17.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EF5654E1; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 13:32:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: by saboteur.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 91B9740; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 13:32:57 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 13:32:57 +0000 From: Bruce M Simpson To: Dario Freni Message-ID: <20040203133257.GJ713@saboteur.dek.spc.org> Mail-Followup-To: Dario Freni , freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, jkh@FreeBSD.org References: <1075559223.615.9.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3siQDZowHQqNOShm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1075559223.615.9.camel@localhost> cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org cc: jkh@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Will rfc2734 be supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 13:33:05 -0000 --3siQDZowHQqNOShm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 03:27:03PM +0100, Dario Freni wrote: > I was wondering if the standard implementation of IPoFW is planning to > be implemented. I'm not expert on device writing, I was also looking for I've already asked Jordan about a code drop from Apple; he's trying to get an answer from the appropriate people. BMS --3siQDZowHQqNOShm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: '' iD8DBQFAH6MIueUpAYYNtTsRAlAWAKClyKvsZ6MbiBqjfvd/ex4UX6xaBQCfRdyb w0In6x2AUBq0sP4gPFaoYsw= =2EIO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3siQDZowHQqNOShm--