From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jun 9 4:53:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from noc.demon.net (server.noc.demon.net [193.195.224.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928ED15453 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 1999 04:53:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fanf@demon.net) Received: by noc.demon.net; id MAA16012; Wed, 9 Jun 1999 12:53:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from fanf.noc.demon.net(195.11.55.83) by inside.noc.demon.net via smap (3.2) id xma015987; Wed, 9 Jun 99 12:52:57 +0100 Received: from fanf by fanf.noc.demon.net with local (Exim 1.73 #2) id 10rgu2-00072e-00; Wed, 9 Jun 1999 12:52:19 +0100 To: jobaldwi@vt.edu From: Tony Finch Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GNU patch gone stale In-Reply-To: <199906090314.XAA24355@smtp2.erols.com> References: Message-Id: Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 12:52:19 +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Baldwin wrote: > >So it would seem that patch and cvs don't interact at all, unless it's a >question of patch 2.5 being able to apply diffs generated by cvs diff. That is the main problem I have with patch 2.5 -- it completely fails to apply patches from `cvs diff` unless you have a really new cvs, and I usually don't. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch dot@dotat.at fanf@demon.net black dog To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message