Date: Mon, 4 Dec 1995 16:28:26 -0500 From: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: wollman@lcs.mit.edu (Garrett A. Wollman), jhay@mikom.csir.co.za, hackers@FreeBSD.org, wollman@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ipx on 802.3 Message-ID: <9512042128.AA01138@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <199512042121.OAA05697@phaeton.artisoft.com> References: <9512042113.AA01059@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> <199512042121.OAA05697@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Mon, 4 Dec 1995 14:21:57 -0700 (MST), Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> said: >> > SYNOPSIS >> > ifconfig interface address_family [address [dest_address]] [parameters] >> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >> > How about that? >> >> Utterly irrelevant. > Are you sure "AF_IPX" won't work? DID YOU EVBEN BOTHER TO READ THE MESSAGE WHICH YOU REPLIED TO???!!! Obviously not, since, as I said, your reply was utterly irrelevant to the question being asked. The question, in case you've forgotten, is: how should one indicate to a network interface that it is to use 802.3 encapsulation rather than Ethernet v2? The answer, as I gave it, was: use the IFF_LINK* flags; that's what they're there for. Now would you please READ the messages before you respond to them? -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9512042128.AA01138>