From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Mar 29 18:46:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from omega.lovett.com (omega.lovett.com [209.249.90.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDA637B419; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 18:46:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [24.243.55.247] (helo=[10.0.0.2] ident=ident) by omega.lovett.com with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1) id 16r8sY-000I1q-00; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 18:46:06 -0800 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1331 Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 20:46:05 -0600 Subject: Re: ports/36433: new port: microsoft sscli From: Ade Lovett To: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira , Alan Eldridge Cc: FreeBSD Ports List , FreeBSD Port Mgr , , Anders Nor Berle Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20020329210323.38114.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 03/29/02 15:03, "Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira" wrote: > Something like that. I just thought of this. Any of you > guys with legalese expertise can help? Having looked at the documents in question, and running a couple by our legal people here (for the mere price of a lunch), I cannot strongly recommend enough that this PR be closed with utmost prejudice and the port NEVER added. At all. This is just one huge big hole saying "sue me". Really. -aDe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message