From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 18 15:45:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFED16A420 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:45:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mshindo@mshindo.net) Received: from ober.mshindo.net (221x245x168x210.ap221.ftth.ucom.ne.jp [221.245.168.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C15B43D6A for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:45:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mshindo@mshindo.net) Received: from localhost (221x245x168x211.ap221.ftth.ucom.ne.jp [221.245.168.211]) by ober.mshindo.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8856E336423 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:52:27 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:45:31 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20050919.004531.92589257.mshindo@mshindo.net> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Motonori Shindo X-Mailer: Mew version 4.1.53 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ARP behavior in FreeBSD vs Linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:45:39 -0000 On FreeBSD (and I guess most Operating Systems as well), ARP reply is sent back only when the target IP address in ARP request matches with one of the IP addresses assigned to the interface through which the ARP Request is received. In contrast, on Linux (by default), it responds as long as the target IP address in ARP Request matches with any "local" IP address on the system, which is not necessarily an IP address assigned to the interface through which the ARP request is received. Is there any advantage/disadvantage in ARP implementation on FreeBSD over that of Linux? Thanks. Regards, Motonori Shindo