From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jun 12 10:00:09 1995 Return-Path: bugs-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA25949 for bugs-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 10:00:09 -0700 Received: from gndrsh.aac.dev.com (gndrsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA25929 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 10:00:06 -0700 Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by gndrsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id JAA02348; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 09:59:50 -0700 From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199506121659.JAA02348@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: make vs. empty lines To: petri@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 09:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Cc: bugs@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199506121507.RAA09330@achill.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de> from "Stefan Petri" at Jun 12, 95 05:07:29 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 828 Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Hi! > > well, the patch that I submitted earlier today does of course not > really fix the problem in all cases (embarassed blush). However, the > problem still remains, that it is seriously annoying when make aborts > on empty lines. Who ever put that feature in, please do us all a favor > and revert it. Work is being done on this right now, I have one submission that has gone for review and been rejected by my second set of eyes, your submission that by your own admission is wrong. There is someone working on this that will get it right. And no, we can't just revert it as there are lots of other fixes in the same commit that are needed and are correct. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Custom computers for FreeBSD