From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 3 0:51:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de [137.226.30.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB1414BEA for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 00:51:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kuku@gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE) Received: (from kuku@localhost) by gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (8.8.8/8.8.7) id JAA26515 for hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 09:50:59 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from kuku) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 09:50:59 +0100 (MET) From: Christoph Kukulies Message-Id: <199903030850.JAA26515@gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: brandelf (necessary?) Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In an environment where FreeBSD needs to run linux binaries that are shared with linux systems, would it do harm to brandelf these binaries? Or in other words, would it be possible for FreeBSD to autodetect that it's a linux ELF binary without having to brand it? -- Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message