From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 15:50:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262921065672 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:50:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154688FC08 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:50:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1RFo9Px057972 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:50:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q1RFo9wh057971; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:50:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:50:09 GMT Message-Id: <201202271550.q1RFo9wh057971@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Jan Henrik Sylvester Cc: Subject: Re: ports/164029: [PATCH] graphics/bmeps fix build with databases/gdbm X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jan Henrik Sylvester List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:50:10 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/164029; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jan Henrik Sylvester To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/164029: [PATCH] graphics/bmeps fix build with databases/gdbm Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:34:27 +0100 I just wondered why this bug is still in the feedback state. I thought it was awaiting maintainer feedback, which it got 1.5 month ago. Or is it waiting for another submitter feedback as the maintainer suggested a larger patch? For the record: The port still fails for me without any patch. Rob Farmer's patch works for me. (In my setting, it produces exactly the same package as with my patch.) Rob Farmer's patch should be committed and as he is the maintainer, no more feedback should be needed for that. Thanks, Jan Henrik