From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jun 2 15:20: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C9514CAA for ; Wed, 2 Jun 1999 15:20:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id PAA02277; Wed, 2 Jun 1999 15:20:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 15:20:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199906022220.PAA02277@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Tom Hukins Subject: Re: ports/11967: p5-Apache port out of date Reply-To: Tom Hukins Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/11967; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tom Hukins To: mvh@ix.netcom.com Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/11967: p5-Apache port out of date Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 10:30:01 +0100 On Mon, May 31, 1999 at 02:51:08PM -0700, mvh@ix.netcom.com wrote: > > >Number: 11967 > >Category: ports > >Synopsis: p5-Apache port out of date Please see ports/10385, which contains a proposal for an apache13-modperl port and an explanation of why I think p5-Apache should be killed off. It seems a shame that there are two separate efforts to create an Apache+mod_perl port. Of course, if p5-Apache is considered superior, I'll gladly accept that decision. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message