From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 26 20:41:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E072F16A4CE for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:41:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-core.space2u.com (mail-core.space2u.com [62.20.1.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164B543D1D for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:41:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jd@dagerot.com) Received: from localhost (www-core.space2u.com [62.20.1.180]) by mail-core.space2u.com (8.13.3/8.13.2) with ESMTP id j0QKewPa028443; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 21:40:58 +0100 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 21:40:58 +0100 Message-Id: <200501262040.j0QKewPa028443@mail-core.space2u.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Joachim Dagerot" To: Kris Kennaway Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: "Colin J. Raven" cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: NFS Mounting, client credentials too weak X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:41:03 -0000 On 2005-01-26 Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 09:25:08AM +0100, Colin J. Raven wrote: >> On Jan 25 at 12:04, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 12:39:59PM +0100, Joachim Dagerot wrote: >> >> >> >> I'm trying to mount from a freeSBIE system (freeBSD 5.3) to my freeBSD >> >> server (5.1) when I get the errormessage: RPCPROG_MNT: RPC: >> >> Authentication error; why = Client credential too weak. >> >> >> >> What can I do? >> > >> > Try to mount as root, not a nonprivileged user. >> >> Unfortunately I ran into the same situation concerning the error message >> above. I *was* root when it happened. I thought perhaps the problem was >> that I was *su'd* to root, so I connected a monitor to the client, >> logged in *as* root then tried to mount the remote share (from my office >> server). Still the same result. > >> To further complicate (or simplify) things, *both* machines are >> 5.3-RELEASE, and in fact the machines themselves are as close to clones >> of one another as you can get. I mention this because inconsistencies >> between local conditions on both machines thus becomes a non-issue. > >What two machines? Above you said one is a FreeSBIE-based 5.3 system >and the other a 5.1 system. I am me and me is Joachim. Colin is Colin and never shall their system be mixed up. I was the guy with freesbie (5.3) and server (5.1) Colin is behind the 5.3-5.3 problem.