From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 20 19:32:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A98106564A for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:32:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (mwlucas-2-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:b9c::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB508FC0A for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6KJWBLM042896; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:32:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p6KJWBpr042895; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:32:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas) Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:32:11 -0400 From: "Michael W. Lucas" To: Jack Vogel Message-ID: <20110720193211.GA42886@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> References: <201107201550.p6KFo9rH032569@freefall.freebsd.org> <54AEE240C5F8411A9D4274605DBD14BC@multiplay.co.uk> <2976D84B193E4D7DAE6F4C4E28B8F909@multiplay.co.uk> <4AED69DE7A474E49BA44470E898ADEDF@multiplay.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:32:12 -0400 (EDT) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Steven Hartland Subject: Re: kern/152828: [em] poor performance on 8.1, 8.2-PRE X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:32:14 -0000 Jack, I think the SCP scenario would be easiest for anyone else to reproduce. If you need a different type of scenario, let me know. I can't put this box into heavy use until I figure this out, so you might as well use me as a guinea pig. Thanks, ==ml On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:18:32AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: > Can you formulate a scenario that anyone else can setup and reproduce this? > > Jack > > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Steven Hartland > wrote: > > > ** > > Yep, it stalls 8.2 partners as well :( > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > *From:* Jack Vogel > > *To:* Steven Hartland > > *Cc:* Michael W. Lucas ; > > freebsd-net@freebsd.org > > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 20, 2011 6:03 PM > > *Subject:* Re: kern/152828: [em] poor performance on 8.1, 8.2-PRE > > > > Did you eliminate that 7.0 box as part of the issue? Meaning switch to say > > a Linux > > or 8.2 partner to see if the problem persists or stops? > > > > > > ================================================ > > This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the > > person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the > > recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise > > disseminating it or any information contained in it. > > > > In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please > > telephone +44 845 868 1337 > > or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk. > > -- Michael W. Lucas http://www.MichaelWLucas.com/, http://blather.MichaelWLucas.com/ Latest book: Network Flow Analysis http://www.networkflowanalysis.com/ mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org, Twitter @mwlauthor