From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov 26 21:19:55 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF9416A41F
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 26 Nov 2005 21:19:55 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com)
Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com
	[66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49FE43D7E
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 26 Nov 2005 21:19:48 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com)
Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149])
	by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403F5D1765C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 26 Nov 2005 16:19:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151])
	by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 26 Nov 2005 16:19:46 -0500
X-Sasl-enc: MnTb/4qJCBkhHbR7SkbeLMhnsIMVAQJmKefnyoHDKZnO 1133039985
Received: from gumby.localdomain (88-104-194-111.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com
	[88.104.194.111])
	by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333E25713C0
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 26 Nov 2005 16:19:45 -0500 (EST)
From: RW <list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 21:19:44 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
References: <20051126182651.A966@www.pukruppa.net>
	<4388A6E4.1040206@makeworld.com> <4388AAB2.1010805@mainframe.ca>
In-Reply-To: <4388AAB2.1010805@mainframe.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200511262119.45582.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>
Subject: Re: Yesterday's -STABLE kernel corrupts LAN
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 21:19:56 -0000

On Saturday 26 November 2005 18:34, Derrick MacPherson wrote:

> Wow, if I could use that sarcasm to fuel my car I'd be happy. I guess we
> would be the only people to run current or stable on a production
> machine, and everyone else is using RELEASE? I guess I should have stuck
> with 4.1x considering all the initial troubles with 5.x, and not go to 6
> at all cause 

Those of us who are content to drive the latest model, should be gratefull 
that there are people who volunteer to be crash-test dummies.