From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 21 16:53:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5FC16A4B3 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:53:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.siscom.net (mail2.siscom.net [209.251.18.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7C7243F85 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:53:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from radams@siscom.net) Received: (qmail 2568 invoked by uid 1005); 21 Oct 2003 23:52:47 -0000 Received: from radams@siscom.net by mail.siscom.net by uid 0 with qmail-scanner-1.14 (f-prot: 3.12. Clear:. Processed in 0.104372 secs); 21 Oct 2003 23:52:47 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: radams@siscom.net via mail.siscom.net X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.14 (Clear:. Processed in 0.104372 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO siscom.net) (209.251.6.250) by mail.siscom.net with SMTP; 21 Oct 2003 23:52:47 -0000 Message-ID: <3F95C6F3.8030005@siscom.net> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 19:53:23 -0400 From: "Robert J. Adams (jason)" Organization: Newshosting.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030914 Thunderbird/0.3a X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org References: <3F95B946.8010309@newshosting.com> <20031021233414.GJ99943@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20031021233414.GJ99943@elvis.mu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: >1 systems 1 FS X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:53:02 -0000 Alfred Perlstein wrote: >>Hello, >> >>I'm working on a new cluster design and had a quick question. If I have >>a few boxes mounting the same FS (over a SAN) all read-only will it >>work? Will I have any trouble? Has anyone tried this with UFS/UFS2 .. > > > You shouldn't. I shouldn't do this or I shouldn't have trouble? :) >>Lets take it one step further.. lets say I have 1 box that mounts it >>RW.. and it updates the contents .. will the other systems that have it >>mounted RO puke? > > > Likely. Well shit.. I need this. -j SISCOM