From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sun Sep 30 18:41:17 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E1A10A3C1D for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 18:41:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B988DBA4 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 18:41:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 32D5410A3C18; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 18:41:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1104910A3C16 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 18:41:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A33F58DB9B for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 18:41:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFAAB238F2 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 18:41:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w8UIfENo065630 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 18:41:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w8UIfEQO065629 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 18:41:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 231807] [New port] math/cocoalib: C++ library for doing computations in commutative algebra Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 18:41:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: phascolarctos@protonmail.ch X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 18:41:17 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D231807 Lorenzo Salvadore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #197620|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #6 from Lorenzo Salvadore --- Created attachment 197639 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D197639&action= =3Dedit cocoalib shar file - correction 2 I did as you suggested for SHEBANG_GLOB and it worked. As for the licenses, I am sorry, but I am not sure to have understood correctly. You tell me "LICENSE_DISTFILES are license files that are zip'd,= gz, etc": I think you meant LICENSE_FILE (the handbook defines LICENSE_FILE as "full path to the file containing the license text" and LICENSE_DISTFILES as "the distribution files to which the licenses apply"). Hence what you mean is that it is not necessary to specify values for the variable LICENCE_FILE when the license is standard? This seems to me to be = in conflict with the first example of https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/licenses.html#license= s-license_distfiles-ex1 and I see that many ports do specify those values (for example editor/openoffice-devel, games/supertuxkart, www/falkon), although I also f= ound counterexamples. Are all those ports wrong? In the new shar file, I removed the LICENSE_FILE_whatever lines, hoping tha= t it was the requested correction. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=