From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 21:03:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B051716A4CE for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:03:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl (pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.97.36.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CF9443F93 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:03:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl) Received: (qmail 22335 invoked by uid 1000); 19 Nov 2003 05:04:35 -0000 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 06:04:35 +0100 From: Michal Pasternak To: Arjan van Leeuwen Message-ID: <20031119050435.GA22285@pasternak.w.lub.pl> References: <200311182219.09828.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200311182219.09828.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> cc: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCO goes after BSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michal Pasternak List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 05:03:42 -0000 Arjan van Leeuwen [Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:19:07PM +0100]: Content-Description: signed data > From http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=03/11/18/1742216 : [...] > SCO is going to attack the 1994 AT&T/BSD settlement. Details here: http://www.windley.com/2003/11/18.html#a919 Anyway, having everything in CVS since beginning still makes BSD situation much better, than Linux. They started using central repository around 2.5.x, and by that time Linux was already over 20 MB of gzipped sources, and - in my opinion - there's rare chance to proove who has been responsible for what. There's nothing to be afraid of. -- Michal Pasternak :: http://pasternak.w.lub.pl