From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan  6 22:33:09 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3038016A417
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun,  6 Jan 2008 22:33:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ivoras@gmail.com)
Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.191])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FC613C447
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun,  6 Jan 2008 22:33:08 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ivoras@gmail.com)
Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so7450596rvb.43
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 14:33:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
	bh=oEACo1PQesqODRvG+b88wYKErlB4WnhUwh9i9hRiVcw=;
	b=dd4taYN41kPD4rvfhYwet0rfiqPSOLL5eVuW09CGFz+4e+7WQuBctYw7f4IdIq0okXEpUwECYyiakkqcweVgdzgxQtrrGZwZHDLmmDzDeoADyjk/yW793uTkg+lUqFbxEqvzaE5uw56kVBD2swint4vXmmSSpe1mZmvWeYMH/5o=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
	b=gZcWOrDQPaU3IzY1jlNqRTfMD4gijtBrp89VeuhVpZzNwXALS+BM2MWiBRN7pOIhMj/AX1RRSBrAl0mjlBCpR/UdLUHpw2MaBkMMDIzy5zE/llUBrFJcJNj+kYoVhtLNPYj6p+sBElL6fDxLMqsFbVMu0VOFSKv5i8sXKngF6Ow=
Received: by 10.140.207.2 with SMTP id e2mr10196381rvg.299.1199658788399;
	Sun, 06 Jan 2008 14:33:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.141.212.1 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 14:33:08 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <9bbcef730801061433y381159aakf2ad51faffdca987@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 23:33:08 +0100
From: "Ivan Voras" <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Sender: ivoras@gmail.com
To: "Scott Long" <scottl@samsco.org>
In-Reply-To: <47814E20.70801@samsco.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <fll63b$j1c$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<20080106141157.I105@fledge.watson.org> <flr0np$euj$2@ger.gmane.org>
	<47810DE3.3050106@FreeBSD.org> <flr3iq$of7$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<478119AB.8050906@FreeBSD.org> <47814160.4050401@samsco.org>
	<478148FD.20605@FreeBSD.org> <47814E20.70801@samsco.org>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: aee7970e52ea0aaa
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ZFS honesty
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:33:09 -0000

On 06/01/2008, Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> wrote:

> I guess what makes me mad about ZFS is that it's all-or-nothing; either
> it works, or it crashes.  It doesn't automatically recognize limits and
> make adjustments or sacrifices when it reaches those limits, it just
> crashes.  Wanting multiple gigabytes of RAM for caching in order to
> optimize performance is great, but crashing when it doesn't get those
> multiple gigabytes of RAM is not so great, and it leaves a bad taste in
> my mouth about ZFS in general.

I agree with the sentiment. I don't know about its implementation, but
surely some kind of backout could have be implemented? I'm just
guessing here: maybe the problem is in M_NOWAIT - maybe there could be
a M_NOWAIT_BUT_ALLOW_NULL that would be safe to use in non-sleepable
code but could return NULL, which could be tested and the whole file
system request postponed...