From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 23 10:05:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B7D1065675; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:05:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from spock-ext.obspm.fr (spock-ext.obspm.fr [145.238.186.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64ABB8FC15; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from obspm.fr (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) by spock-ext.obspm.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/DIO Observatoire de Paris - 15/04/10) with ESMTP id p2NA543O018560 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:05:06 +0100 Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:05:04 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <20110323100504.GA8779@obspm.fr> References: <20110322131435.GA5792@obspm.fr> <4D890905.9010000@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4D890905.9010000@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.4 (spock-ext.obspm.fr [145.238.186.20]); Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:05:06 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at spock-ext.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setfib mount X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:05:08 -0000 Le 22/03/2011 à 13:39:33-0700, Julian Elischer a écrit > On 3/22/11 6:14 AM, Albert Shih wrote: > > Hi all > > > > Sorry for the cross-posting. I don't known which list is the best. > > > > I'm using freebsd-jail since 5.x and yesterday I upgrading (from 7.3 to > > 7.4). > > > > I've see the setfib working now pretty well with the jail. So I using two > > routing table. One for the host, one for the jails. > > > > But I don't known why the NFS mount (on the host of course) didn't use the > > 0 routing table. So when I try to execute the mount the connection start > > from the second interface. If I do > > > > setfib 0 mount > > > > every thing work fine. > > > > I don't known if it's a bug. If it's strange(for me) feature how can I tell > > /etc/fstab to do that ? > > does your jail mount anything? > No. The mount is on the host. Regards. JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO batiment 15 Observatoire de Paris Meudon 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26/06 86 69 95 71 Heure local/Local time: mer 23 mar 2011 11:00:34 CET