From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 13 13:01:34 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2932916A4CE
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 May 2005 13:01:34 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from relay.pair.com (relay00.pair.com [209.68.1.20])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68D6843D6D
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 May 2005 13:01:33 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: (qmail 73535 invoked from network); 13 May 2005 13:01:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown)
  by unknown with SMTP; 13 May 2005 13:01:32 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 08:01:16 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20050513162930.B12839@mp2.macomnet.net>
Message-ID: <20050513080009.I731@odysseus.silby.com>
References: <BEA93507.1B3D1%gandalf@digital.net>
	<20050513005221.S731@odysseus.silby.com>
	<20050513162930.B12839@mp2.macomnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
cc: Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@freebsd.org>
cc: Gandalf The White <gandalf@digital.net>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD and the Rose Attack / NewDawn
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 13:01:34 -0000


On Fri, 13 May 2005, Maxim Konovalov wrote:

> [...]
>> So, test out my attached patch with varying settings of
>> maxfragspersecond and see if it makes any difference for you.
>
> Am I right the above delta is a letfover from Suleiman's work and it's
> not needed at all?
>
> -- 
> Maxim Konovalov

Correct, good catch!

Mike "Silby" Silbersack