Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:53:35 -0700 From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: no console with ACPI Message-ID: <4341A85F.9080204@root.org> In-Reply-To: <200510031750.30674.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <20051003203544.GG74917@cell.sick.ru> <200510031750.30674.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 03 October 2005 04:35 pm, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > >> John, >> >>regarding no console with ACPI. We have tried your patch from this >>mail: >> >> >>http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi/2005-September/001941.html >> >>It is strange, but with this patch there is no console with ACPI >>_and without ACPI_, too, unlike before. > > > Grr, now you don't have an isa0 device at all in either case. However, the > device must exist because the legacy0 device didn't add one in the non-ISA > case. The device must not have been attached somehow. Oh, I know what the > problem is. The isa(4) driver only attaches as a child of isab. I've > updated the patch to have the viapm(4) driver also include an isa(4) driver > that attaches as a child of either viapm(4) or viapropm(4). I've updated the > patch at the URL http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/viapm_isab.patch The patch looks good. The right URL is: http://people.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/via_isab.patch -- Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4341A85F.9080204>