Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 16:51:30 -0700 From: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> To: scratch65535@att.net Cc: Jan Beich <jbeich@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: gtkmm30 fails to build under 10.3 Message-ID: <CAN6yY1s_ZWa7HFV4eRs8jG2cC-ywXrigy3zgQ0-3wd=WHtU6EA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1uLBkM_yzQUt9DbNTQFpyOSF21M0u67LC1XqksrPxmogQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <9la9pch88dj02bs7ts4r1cfa7lgvnssh28__31177.0872948275$1502915924$gmane$org@4ax.com> <378r-8cln-wny@FreeBSD.org> <h4c9pchl3v7m431cs5bed2jp8he0hl1cd6@4ax.com> <CAN6yY1uLBkM_yzQUt9DbNTQFpyOSF21M0u67LC1XqksrPxmogQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 2:12 PM, <scratch65535@att.net> wrote: > >> [Default] On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 22:46:44 +0200, Jan Beich >> <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> >> ><scratch65535@att.net> writes: >> > >> >> Package dependency requirement 'giomm-2.4 >= 2.49.1' could not be >> >> satisfied. >> >> Package 'giomm-2.4' has version '2.44.0', required version is '>= >> >> 2.49.1' >> >> Package dependency requirement 'pangomm-1.4 >= 2.38.2' could not >> >> be satisfied. >> >> Package 'pangomm-1.4' has version '2.36.0', required version is >> >> '>= 2.38.2' >> >> Package dependency requirement 'gtk+-3.0 >= 3.22.0' could not be >> >> satisfied. >> >> Package 'gtk+-3.0' has version '3.18.8', required version is '>= >> >> 3.22.0' >> >> Package dependency requirement 'cairomm-1.0 >= 1.12.0' could not >> >> be satisfied. >> >> Package 'cairomm-1.0' has version '1.10.0', required version is >> >> '>= 1.12.0' >> >> Package dependency requirement 'gdk-pixbuf-2.0 >= 2.35.5' could >> >> not be satisfied. >> >> Package 'gdk-pixbuf-2.0' has version '2.32.3', required version >> >> is '>= 2.35.5' >> > >> >Upgrade dependencies as instructed or switch to binary packages. >> >> That's all well and good, but searches turned up no reference to >> giomm in package or in ports, only in includes, and only for 2.4. >> I'd guess that that compiland, at least, doen't have an >> independent existence--since if it does, it should have been >> fetched by the makefile. But I'm open to suggestion, if you know >> where the latest-and-greatest bits are. >> >> (I just tried to build gtkmm20 as a fallback, and it failed too, >> finding many undefined references, and finally failing with a >> linker problem it wouldn't tell me about. I added the -v to >> ldflags and tried again, but it only repeated the request that I >> use the -v flag. The actual call to ld seems to be somewhere >> other than the makefile) >> > > Something is clearly messed up. Looking at the log I see: > configure:3475: checking for C++ compiler version > configure:3484: c++ --version >&5 > FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) > 20140512 > Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.3 > Thread model: posix > > This is followed by a lot of errors about compile options: > Selected GCC installation: > configure:3495: $? = 0 > configure:3484: c++ -V >&5 > c++: error: argument to '-V' is missing (expected 1 value) > > This should be compiled by gcc, not clang. I don't know if there is > something that breaks this on 10.3, but it is unlikely as lots of > complaints should be coming in. > > Do you have either /etc/make.conf or /etc/src.conf? If so, what is in them? > -- > Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com > PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 > Please ignore my last message. I misread the log. the errors are expected. Still looking at this. Something odd is going on, but I'm not sure what. I'd still like to see the make.conf and src.conf if you have them. They are optional, so you may not.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1s_ZWa7HFV4eRs8jG2cC-ywXrigy3zgQ0-3wd=WHtU6EA>