From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Nov 23 20:11:39 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA00983
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 20:11:39 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA00976
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 20:11:37 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from julian@whistle.com)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA22956;
	Sun, 23 Nov 1997 20:02:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from UNKNOWN(), claiming to be "current1.whistle.com"
 via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd022954; Sun Nov 23 20:02:27 1997
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 20:00:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
To: Alex Nash <nash@mcs.com>
cc: deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: pthread_cond_timedwait returning wrong error?
In-Reply-To: <199711232301.RAA19042@zen.nash.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.971123195951.29611D-100000@current1.whistle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

don't forget 2.2.x
(it has basically the same code)


On Sun, 23 Nov 1997, Alex Nash wrote:

> On 23 Nov, Daniel M. Eischen wrote:
> > 
> > Is EAGAIN the correct error for a timeout from a
> > pthread_cond_timedwait() call?  I would think that
> > ETIMEDOUT would be more appropriate.
> 
> According to my 1996 edition of ANSI/IEEE std 1003.1, you are correct --
> ETIMEDOUT should be returned.  I've committed a fix for this into
> -current.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Alex
> 
> 
>