From owner-freebsd-qa Fri Jan 18 20:48:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (rwcrmhc52.attbi.com [216.148.227.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FEE837B404; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 20:48:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org ([12.233.149.189]) by rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020119044826.UYAG3578.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@bmah.dyndns.org>; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 04:48:26 +0000 Received: (from bmah@localhost) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0J4mQ560188; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 20:48:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200201190448.g0J4mQ560188@bmah.dyndns.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: John Hay Cc: murray@FreeBSD.ORG (Murray Stokely), qa@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RELENG_4_5 Branch : January 21 ? In-reply-to: <200201190424.g0J4O3M97256@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za> References: <200201190424.g0J4O3M97256@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za> Comments: In-reply-to John Hay message dated "Sat, 19 Jan 2002 06:24:02 +0200." From: bmah@acm.org (Bruce A. Mah) Reply-To: bmah@acm.org X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 20:48:25 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If memory serves me right, John Hay wrote: > Why not do it in the RELENG_4 tree? Maybe start with it even before RC1 (in > the future). There is nothing that says the documentation shipped with the > RCs shouldn't already claim 4.5 or is there? I think you will get more eyes > on it in the RELENG_4 branch. I try to make the release documentation track newvers.sh...otherwise it's kind of confusing to have multiple release note documents that say "4.5-RELEASE". It's actually quite trivial to bump the version number (it's controlled by SGML entities, which are all defined in one file). Like I pointed out in other email, problems in the release notes are likely due to *other* "misteaks". Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message