Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 19:39:31 +0200 From: Alberto Villa <avilla@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, =?KOI8-R?B?4s/SydMg88HNz9LPxM/X?= <bsam@passap.ru>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r303449 - head/Mk Message-ID: <CAJp7RHbL9vTfD7vqmQ3VZZqQq3WhHazYk0kH_hzxqqoTrxC9LA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120902171626.GC10884@FreeBSD.org> References: <201208312252.q7VMqj07007701@svn.freebsd.org> <5041C874.20301@passap.ru> <CAJp7RHZVja_LnV=TDP22ycoaqSssa09iSUJ-VKYmP1bRgQ6Hiw@mail.gmail.com> <5041CDC3.6020702@passap.ru> <CAJp7RHaWmbn1ugxaBZZVM2Y2YKreg9BJnH-2pA60XxOkoOm4eA@mail.gmail.com> <20120902171626.GC10884@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote: > I was thinking of making all *container* formats to be stated like this, > similarly to what I did about lossless audio codecs. The only potential > problem I see in this case is that most users can be confused about what > exactly a "container" does mean (I, for instance, also completely forgot > that Ogg is not just audio file format). I agree that "container" is a bit obscure. The difference might be between codec and format (format in place of container). -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer <avilla@FreeBSD.org> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJp7RHbL9vTfD7vqmQ3VZZqQq3WhHazYk0kH_hzxqqoTrxC9LA>