From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 13:11:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1F7106567B for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:11:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B148FC26 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id QAA02965; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:00:49 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4E9D7880.1030308@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:00:48 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111003 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Klymenko References: <4E9D4124.9000307@eenet.ee> <12913.3257120431$1318938804@news.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <12913.3257120431$1318938804@news.gmane.org> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:28:33 +0000 Cc: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ffmpeg & ULE X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:11:29 -0000 on 18/10/2011 14:30 Ivan Klymenko said the following: > В Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:04:36 +0300 > Urmas Lett пишет: > >> Hello. >> >> Why is ffmpeg -threads massively slower with ULE than 4BSD? >> >> ffmpeg preset veryfast with sched_bsd: >> real 1m49.407s >> user 6m53.932s >> sys 0m1.700s >> >> ffmpeg preset veryfast with sched_ule: >> real 2m52.711s >> user 6m50.310s >> sys 0m1.582s >> >> #uname -a >> FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 #0: Mon Oct 17 20:32:29 EEST >> >> > > probably because you have a system processor with 2 cores...? > if yes - then use the 4BSD...it is better for the two cores... IMHO Do you have any facts to substantiate your claim? -- Andriy Gapon