From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 24 00:27:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D8C1065677 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 00:27:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eam1edward@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B991B8FC16 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 00:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadv36 with SMTP id v36so4075409dad.13 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:27:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5aqevKXlX3AJady0ERsz65yJiuqSWfm8FMvW/pi5Jps=; b=ehbZWyi1cHQRHoIt47pxGdfhXJFIoHgEeBHMyeTg9zMq+kYjXT4gTOYwRXRz9QfbP/ edtzZzfU6lkqETS7VtPP6T4S3gP2VGFIFrETxr7yMoVRb6wkvJj5LunOjn3ZlzPyMJFx LvGgblicU6wWCRLQmKUHoLLgtyeYK0oPdRrV/yjqyE2ggKIZiCCWgmh2Txa+Vjg00w1D mooxJ1HhDUvM6/gJsAlZ0wZiuyvZqVToJm+Po2qf+u3XtfTBd3Rp9VDPz4laIG/387xb 0INNvsFwxqQW0s/rd+wHlzi25Xk9NHPqG+JyQjTLxQUrltHQ9DD5DUJmmwWKRL2wu2im X1ow== Received: by 10.68.217.234 with SMTP id pb10mr25027373pbc.79.1340497665293; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:27:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([174.134.109.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u5sm3681809pbu.76.2012.06.23.17.27.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FE6602C.2050800@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:32:44 -0700 From: Edward M User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Levine References: <20120624001622.17052.qmail@joyce.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120624001622.17052.qmail@joyce.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is ZFS production ready? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 00:27:46 -0000 On 06/23/2012 05:16 PM, John Levine wrote: > Sorry, I misread my notes, 8.2 uses v 15, 8.3 uses v 28. > > R's, > John yeah, I remember version 15 was really stable. Opensolaris 2009.06 last binary production ready, used version 14; i also found it to be stable Any opensource zfs pool verisons beyound that, i am not really sure about their stablity compared to UFS rock solid filesystem.