From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Oct 3 6: 1:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from saturn.psn.net (saturn.psn.net [207.211.58.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667E614D91 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 1999 06:01:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@blackdawn.com) Received: from shadow.blackdawn.com (5042-243.008.popsite.net [209.224.140.243]) by saturn.psn.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA12050; Sun, 3 Oct 1999 06:10:48 -0700 (MST) Received: (from will@localhost) by shadow.blackdawn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA09744; Sun, 3 Oct 1999 09:01:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from will) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <19991003141519.A734@blues.ghis.net> Date: Sun, 03 Oct 1999 09:01:14 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: Will Andrews From: Will Andrews To: Jim Mock Subject: RE: epic4 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 03-Oct-99 Jim Mock wrote: > Any objections to me updating the epic4 port to 2.004-19990927? I've > got the diffs ready to go, I just wanted to make sure there wasn't a > reason why it was still at 2.003 before committing it. On a related matter, Is there really any reason to keep two different versions of EPIC anymore? I always use EPIC4 rather than the ircii-epic port (which is ircii2.8.2-EPIC3.004, which seems rather obsolete now). Regards, -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message