From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 15 09:50:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6CA16A51C; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 09:50:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F18843D31; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 09:50:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i2FHsVee022505 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:54:32 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i2FHoHjZ070665; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:50:17 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:50:17 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Andrey Chernov , "David O'Brien" , src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040315175017.GB64789@ip.net.ua> References: <200403050147.i251l39I006593@repoman.freebsd.org> <200403042036.i24KaIeq025097@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040305141012.GA10639@ip.net.ua> <20040305143708.GA70192@nagual.pp.ru> <20040305152247.GB11063@ip.net.ua> <20040315001023.GP63585@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040315001619.GA1586@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040315065623.GA43263@ip.net.ua> <20040315080007.GA21742@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XF85m9dhOBO43t/C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040315080007.GA21742@nagual.pp.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils Makefile.inc0 X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:50:18 -0000 --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 11:00:08AM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:56:23AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Sure, but I think we should stick with what GNU configure would pick > > if it was run with getopt_long() in libc, either FSF or our libc > > version. >=20 > There is no similarity in that point in ports. Some ports search for=20 > getopt_long() (and got it from libc, of course), but some compile their= =20 > own copies in anycase. >=20 My own opinion is that we should let them do this. If you are in a mood of fixing binutils autoconf files to check for existence of getopt_long() and submit them back to BU maintainers, or just throw them an idea, that would be great, and if accepted, future imports will do it automatically. David won't even probably notice that, and I'll be forced to fix the upgrade path from RELENG_4. Hell, but I've dealt with it already. ;) Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov FreeBSD committer ru@FreeBSD.org --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQFAVezZUkv4P6juNwoRAlSxAJduROgk4AAJgGbfNjpQZJuBG+VRAJ0SLoZd MjOS+1ZW90WbfRQ42e4qaA== =2VB4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C--