Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 17:00:23 +0200 From: Chris Zumbrunn <chris@czv.com> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Main site makeover Message-ID: <0c19a828b89deb289d6977f01a24b86c@czv.com> In-Reply-To: <20050529162546.21d97df4@localhost> References: <20050528165128.DEB8B1F50B1@ws1-2.us4.outblaze.com><20050528225538.GD19079@gothmog.gr><c3ac406e38228864bfdf51f416da2d92@czv.com> <20050529162546.21d97df4@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 29, 2005, at 4:25 PM, Fabian Keil wrote: > Chris Zumbrunn <chris@czv.com> wrote: > >> Yes, that was exactly the idea. There is a version committed in >> Perforce that took that approach and looks like this: >> >> http://czv.com/zones/beastie/freebsd/freebsdweb1h.html >> http://czv.com/zones/beastie/freebsd/freebsdweb2h.html > > Looks good. Was there already a discussion if the links > should stay underlined or not? IMHO they should. Yes, Ceri Davies took a very strong stand in favor of keeping the underlines: On Jan 12, 2005, at 8:52 PM, Ceri Davies wrote: > In short: I will not commit, and will request a backout of, any patch > that turns off underlined links on the website. I may not stop short > of > backing it out myself either, and with that said I'll try not to reply > to this thread any more, for the sake of everyone's sanity. That thread is in the freebsd-www archive... http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-www/2005-January/001934.html I would personally prefer to drop the underlines. /czv
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0c19a828b89deb289d6977f01a24b86c>