From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 15 10:46:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C0016A4CE for ; Sat, 15 May 2004 10:46:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mygirlfriday.info (user204.net795.mo.sprint-hsd.net [65.41.216.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D53E43D6A for ; Sat, 15 May 2004 10:46:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from letric@mygirlfriday.info) Received: (qmail 42231 invoked from network); 15 May 2004 17:46:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mygirlfriday.info) (192.168.0.5) by mongo.mygirlfriday.info with SMTP; 15 May 2004 17:46:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 7993 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2004 17:46:45 -0000 Message-ID: <20040515174645.7992.qmail@letric.mygirlfriday.info> Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 12:46:45 -0500 From: Gary To: Richard Marriner Mail-Followup-To: Richard Marriner , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <001301c43a0b$2ae8d610$2248abcd@LEOPARD> <20040515001228.5358.qmail@letric.mygirlfriday.info> <000601c43a9f$b466bee0$2248abcd@LEOPARD> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000601c43a9f$b466bee0$2248abcd@LEOPARD> Organization: Hardly User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TeaPOP pop3 server. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 17:46:47 -0000 On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 10:11:47AM -0700 or thereabouts, Richard Marriner wrote: > Gary wrote: > > I would say, give it a go... on high volume servers, the focal area of > > concern is disk I/O, as this will be your slowest area. > Thank you for your suggestion. I will for sure give it a try.. You are welcome. It sounds like a nice project... The only thing I would have done differently (purely subjective on my part), would be to use LDAP with or without PAM auth instead of the MySql db... LDAP scales well into the millions of users, if need be, and runs very smooth enjoy -- Gary