From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 7 17:07:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C554FA7 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 17:07:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE1402919 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 17:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s77H70Z4071024 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 17:07:00 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 184375] New port: net-mgmt/nagios-check_relayd_status Nagios plug-in to check on the status of relayd Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 17:07:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rand@iteris.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 17:07:01 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184375 --- Comment #8 from rand@iteris.com --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #6) > (In reply to rand from comment #2) > > Created attachment 145451 [details] > > Results of poudriere testport > > > > Attached is the results of poudriere's testport. The first run did find 2 > > check-plist errors, that I'm not sure are valid, but I added to pkg-plist > > anyway: > > > > Error: Orphaned: @dirrmtry etc/periodic/daily > > Error: Orphaned: @dirrmtry etc/periodic > > > > I'll update the shar file attachement in a minute. > > > So to be clear, this comment doesn't apply to the PR, right? Your testlog > was clean but no new shar ca(In reply to John Marino from comment #6) > (In reply to rand from comment #2) > > Created attachment 145451 [details] > > Results of poudriere testport > > > > Attached is the results of poudriere's testport. The first run did find 2 > > check-plist errors, that I'm not sure are valid, but I added to pkg-plist > > anyway: > > > > Error: Orphaned: @dirrmtry etc/periodic/daily > > Error: Orphaned: @dirrmtry etc/periodic > > > > I'll update the shar file attachement in a minute. > > > So to be clear, this comment doesn't apply to the PR, right? Your testlog > was clean but no new shar came. This comment was from me uploading the wrong testport result for this PR. I just uploaded a new testport result and a new SHAR too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.