Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 20:08:23 +0300 From: Valentin Nechayev <netch@lucky.net> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: `Hiding' libc symbols Message-ID: <20030506170823.GI83663@lucky.net> In-Reply-To: <xzpy91k3j9n.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <20030501182820.GA53641@madman.celabo.org> <XFMail.20030501144502.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20030501191027.GA53801@madman.celabo.org> <20030505110601.H53365@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20030505175426.GA19352@madman.celabo.org> <xzpk7d53zu5.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030505205051.GA40572@nagual.pp.ru> <20030505231135.GA21953@madman.celabo.org> <20030505231837.GA44533@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpy91k3j9n.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tue, May 06, 2003 at 04:23:48, des wrote about "Re: `Hiding' libc symbols": >> On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 18:11:35 -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > >> I think such fascism would result in us behaving in a very un-UNIX > >> fashion. >> And I think just opposite. > And I think you just don't understand the issue, and should leave it > to those who do while you take time off to read ISO/IEC 9899:1990. Can you please say some extraction from it for those poor guys not having got this standard? -netch-
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030506170823.GI83663>