Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 May 2013 06:45:48 -0600
From:      Jamie Gritton <jamie@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Dewayne Geraghty <dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au>
Cc:        'Harald Schmalzbauer' <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de>, freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?
Message-ID:  <518CEBFC.1010408@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <3AF9A67BBCE34917A8C9BC2863F7C0A5@as.lan>
References:  <511E61F5.1000805@omnilan.de> <511EC759.4060704@FreeBSD.org> <5121EC52.5040502@omnilan.de> <20130219212430.GA92116@felucia.tataz.chchile.org> <514B9EF6.3000607@quip.cz> <514BA14F.3090609@FreeBSD.org> <514BA3D9.5010901@quip.cz> <514BAA01.20402@FreeBSD.org> <20130509091738.GC4437@caravan.chchile.org> <518BA433.6050605@FreeBSD.org> <3AF9A67BBCE34917A8C9BC2863F7C0A5@as.lan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/09/13 22:42, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> An ugly workaround to complete the jail closure, when relying on jail.conf, is to:
>
> jail -r $JAILNAME
> umount /$LOCATION_OF_JAILS/$JAILNAME/dev || true

The only problem with devfs I'm aware of is it not catching the right
ruleset when starting in the rc system. So does this mean you're having
problems unmounting /dev?

What happens when you add a "-v" to the "jail -r"? It should note that
/dev is being umounted.

- Jamie



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?518CEBFC.1010408>