From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Feb 8 12:49:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from raiden.jasnetworks.net (raiden.jasnetworks.net [65.194.248.251]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D4637B41A for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 12:49:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from works ([192.168.0.2]) by raiden.jasnetworks.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g18KomD07743 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 15:50:49 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from raiden23@netzero.net) Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20020208154856.00989cf0@pop.netzero.net> X-Sender: raiden23@pop.netzero.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 15:54:39 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Lord Raiden Subject: Re: Breaking permissions on Windows 2000 (Server Edition) In-Reply-To: <20020208211159.D57DB14C8D@mail.westmoormfg.com> References: <00e401c1b0dc$78bab440$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <1013160210.3c639912e49de@mail.broadpark.no> <00e401c1b0dc$78bab440$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG My only assumption on this is he mis-spoke himself, cause I have yet to see any version of windows that's more secure than Unix. Heck, window 3.1 and Dos 6.2 are even more secure than anything since them. Heck, they haven't even produced anything decently respectable since then. > > Fortunately, Windows isn't that much worse than Multics, and is > > considerably more secure than UNIX. > >HAHAHAHAHAHAAH!!! hehehe... hohoho. > >:-D >Good one. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message