Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 15:54:39 -0500 From: Lord Raiden <raiden23@netzero.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Breaking permissions on Windows 2000 (Server Edition) Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20020208154856.00989cf0@pop.netzero.net> In-Reply-To: <20020208211159.D57DB14C8D@mail.westmoormfg.com> References: <00e401c1b0dc$78bab440$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <1013160210.3c639912e49de@mail.broadpark.no> <00e401c1b0dc$78bab440$0a00000a@atkielski.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
My only assumption on this is he mis-spoke himself, cause I have
yet to see any version of windows that's more secure than Unix. Heck,
window 3.1 and Dos 6.2 are even more secure than anything since
them. Heck, they haven't even produced anything decently respectable since
then.
> > Fortunately, Windows isn't that much worse than Multics, and is
> > considerably more secure than UNIX.
>
>HAHAHAHAHAHAAH!!! hehehe... hohoho. <whew!>
>
>:-D
>Good one.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.0.58.20020208154856.00989cf0>