From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 16 21:01:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E64495 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:01:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdavidlists@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ia0-x22c.google.com (mail-ia0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22c]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C509F1740 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:01:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f172.google.com with SMTP id k38so815414iah.17 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 14:01:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=v55q5pdEQ5Kil8XhhWrM1jcWOr0JRpa2vqPkvsGWwxI=; b=M6qK0hwzgRa2PFYbXXoqATZ2x/RuOcOIQx5VfexnITj1KT/wS7bDduxdc7fbG5Aj0s sfxQ6BUXy90soNkW0nefNgzGmHh5gQjCUIGJc+ZbymYze7CMatSHxJ12dOYzGeQYbjoA ekusP3i1su5ZUtMpyMv7DVkKV9gOcSvkSd24vhRoen7jgHZR41d50Kbj3FJkMsjtQBfl Nj2G1Dy3oux4q+/gwszFoa7JWO9++K3F6h3AS+OxW7mT+xuWonDj2yegAbYlhAlYyp/9 zp7kXH3aIF3de/PuIemlhNZyxQg5ZKy0B22+1cPmN7oMvnJyk/ZxZH6fmj5OsypD3LPi RQ1Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.153.81 with SMTP id ve17mr2573341igb.24.1366146113447; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 14:01:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jdavidlists@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.83.83 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 14:01:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201F03E5D@ltcfiswmsgmb21> References: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201F03E5D@ltcfiswmsgmb21> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:01:52 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: FG671OV40_07tPvGC_LwIKsb1tg Message-ID: Subject: Re: routing in VIMAGE jails with different versions From: J David To: "Teske, Devin" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "" X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:01:54 -0000 On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Teske, Devin wrote: > I've been running with that patch for years now. I asked the author of the > patch if he had plans to merge it in, he said he wasn't happy with one > edge-case. > Did he happen to mention what the edge case was? If there really is no other way to set the default route in an i386 VIMAGE jail, maybe it's something that could be revisited. (Or I can try to track him down directly, but I don't want to annoy him with a bunch of questions he may already have answered. :) ) I don't know where this stands, but just wanted to chime-in that the patch > works well for us in the situation you describe. > Thanks for the feedback! The 2011 patch was for 8.x and doesn't apply cleanly to the rtsock.c in 9-STABLE, which makes me nervous since this code is quite over my head. But I've eyeballed the rejects anyway and they seem minor, so I may have something to test soon.