From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 20 10:59:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F5A16A4CE for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:59:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp0.server.rpi.edu (smtp0.server.rpi.edu [128.113.53.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318B643D54 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:59:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp0.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i3KHwwEd013145; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 13:58:58 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <019601c426b0$77dc91a0$7890a8c0@dyndns.org> References: <019601c426b0$77dc91a0$7890a8c0@dyndns.org> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 13:58:56 -0400 To: "Cyrille Lefevre" , From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) cc: Albert Cahalan Subject: Re: ps enhencements (posix syntax, and more) X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:59:01 -0000 At 10:21 AM +0200 4/20/04, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: >I've finished to cleanup my code and to merge recent changes >made by Garance. I've get rid of my -X feature for now, and >replaced it with -q (posix mode) and -Q (sunos/tru64 compat >mode, aka the return of -g which means -a w/o process group >leaders, and sizes displayed in KGM format). > >A detailled description of what I've made may be found here : > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/65803 > >some enhancements requires a provided kernel path (cursig, >systime, umask and usertime keywords). > >Of course, I don't expect all of my changes be accepted as-is, >however, I hope we will talk about what could be accepted or not, >but, please, don't reject all the code for any bad reason and >don't be too close. Ugh. There is a lot in your update. Some of it I like, some of it conflicts with other changes I'm already working on, some of it I do not like, and some of it I have not figured out what I think about it yet. (I only made a quick look through your PR) >the next step would have to merge NetBSD/OpenBSD full dynamic >sizing of fields (to get rid of our current static sizing of most >of the fields) as well as to integrate the NetBSD -k keyword. Yeah, I wanted to do more with dynamic sizing, but I have not spent any time on it yet. I have been looking at -k, but I wasn't sure how much it would increase the size of `ps'. I am not sure when I will have time to look at all that you have done, but I will look through your changes before doing any more major commits to `ps'. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu