From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 18 22:19:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from clmboh1-smtp3.columbus.rr.com (unknown [65.24.0.112]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727EC37B400 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:19:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.iowna.com (dhcp065-024-023-038.columbus.rr.com [65.24.23.38]) by clmboh1-smtp3.columbus.rr.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f0J6H6706990; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 01:17:07 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3A67DBC3.CEB2BE72@mail.iowna.com> Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 01:16:35 -0500 From: Bill Moran X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mark.rowlands@minmail.net Cc: Per Tore Larsen , "'ceh5'" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SV: Apache 1.3 and FreeBSD 4.0/Win2k References: <25879E6A7E74D411B9370050043B7F3E09F887@fernonorden.com> <01011907022003.00723@web1.tninet.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mark Rowlands wrote: > > If you only are using IIS (ICS? I guess this is a typo) your out > > of luck. You need something like MS Proxy to let you map ports > > like that to the internal network. > > This is just not true........both NAT and ICS on Win2000 permit this, are we > starting to use FUD! Relax, it's not FUD, it's a misunderstanding. ICS = Internet Connection Sharing It's Microso~1 implementation of NAT. > > Your not really on the right mailing list to get support how to setup > > your Win2k to do this, but basiclly you need to tell Win2k that when it > > get a request on port 100 it should forward this to the internal ip > > of the FreeBSD port 80. You can know axess the web-page on the internet > > by typing in IE http://hostname.com:100 > > this is true if unhelpful, it doesn't answer his question Not completely unhelpful. The basic technique for accomplishing what he's said is the same no matter what system is used. Basically, you need to create a static port translation on the W2K box. Personally, I'm not familiar with ICS, it may or may not be capable of static translations. The earlier statement that MS-Proxy is needed may be true. This is research you'll need to do to set it up. There are details missing here that are resulting in confusing answers. The main details are: do you have only 1 public IP? Are you running some sort of address translation on the W2K box? Is ICS capable of static port translation? Hope this clears some things up. -Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message