Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:04:36 -0400 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Walter von Entferndt <walter.von.entferndt@posteo.net> Cc: freebsd-stable stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: after latest patches i386 not fully patched Message-ID: <CAPyFy2CW_aYvMJ=KZHyjz2eND1KUzrJX0%2BqO=GHVLs0Yg%2B2-sA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9080800.RH3biPoPvx@t450s.local.lan> References: <mailman.14.1600603200.10880.freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> <9080800.RH3biPoPvx@t450s.local.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 at 03:42, Walter von Entferndt <walter.von.entferndt@posteo.net> wrote: > > At Sonntag, 20. September 2020, 14:00:00 CEST, Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> > wrote: > > Until pkgbase is in place the most straightforward way to address this > > issue will probably be for us to ship a new kernel even if not > > necessary, just to update the version number. > -1 from all with limited bandwith and/or volume. > Updates should be as small as possible. The updates are delivered as binary patches (bspatch); a patch to change the kernel version is probably less data than this email.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2CW_aYvMJ=KZHyjz2eND1KUzrJX0%2BqO=GHVLs0Yg%2B2-sA>