From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Sep 21 14:04:52 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282C13F25B9 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 14:04:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-il1-f181.google.com (mail-il1-f181.google.com [209.85.166.181]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bw5mM0WwNz4Jkb for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 14:04:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-il1-f181.google.com with SMTP id s88so13813555ilb.6 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 07:04:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZtwqbiIYtmhb/ZsNWLAyvSfEH7c9zwgyqmdsvNWWuT0=; b=PR53owHq6PLuatKs0pZrg8RI+FZiqmh6wMc9hEuTjIycWLKkVVSjVQNKsY/FxQjjyi ZZS4tteoxBH2gBlLa5zYqKnmpwFbniPmzTrXZrjWbcVjuhI5TmN9eL5djIDANEhzkyHd 4g5C+57QQOaRppqt8+bApOI/NQriqLzeo9cRCAhrjFzMgE0G/GAaikJLbBztD9evNlCU LF9OP4F5FhslmEqrN0c/1OAY19WyJppfbY8h3k+K+mEv75S/2yz822bTo6jLWLXdWxyY BsU2qYxgBHpjsEGaFY8yCxIMDJ3RWsso7qim9DGUjlTo4GXzDu569fUe5GfVqeoZs7Fq MDdw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532FVNVf778Jg0wwavu14YZO/FGwvm28ni3zLJ+mNJJqit5OFtvg WYfiHpWkLjPHFzylPStPk31sCgFwaSyDJgxZ9dd3Zlvg X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwuiyLmEzYsNAK3OgBZ8Crhxf9HDCs4yBuIYuY4DLgVyGpL/ghdymZ6TXbLVCfc+EraBi6xoiB3LgqOsbyVtF4= X-Received: by 2002:a92:d742:: with SMTP id e2mr32682ilq.11.1600697088848; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 07:04:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9080800.RH3biPoPvx@t450s.local.lan> In-Reply-To: <9080800.RH3biPoPvx@t450s.local.lan> From: Ed Maste Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:04:36 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: after latest patches i386 not fully patched To: Walter von Entferndt Cc: freebsd-stable stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bw5mM0WwNz4Jkb X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carpeddiem@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.181 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carpeddiem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.08 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[carpeddiem]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.02)[-1.023]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.07)[-0.068]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.166.181:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.993]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.166.181:from]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-stable]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 14:04:52 -0000 On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 at 03:42, Walter von Entferndt wrote: > > At Sonntag, 20. September 2020, 14:00:00 CEST, Ed Maste > wrote: > > Until pkgbase is in place the most straightforward way to address this > > issue will probably be for us to ship a new kernel even if not > > necessary, just to update the version number. > -1 from all with limited bandwith and/or volume. > Updates should be as small as possible. The updates are delivered as binary patches (bspatch); a patch to change the kernel version is probably less data than this email.