From owner-freebsd-current  Tue May 29 10: 1:30 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A32DA37B423; Tue, 29 May 2001 10:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA96866;
	Tue, 29 May 2001 13:01:24 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from wollman)
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 13:01:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <200105291701.NAA96866@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To: John <jwd@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: Current List <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Correctness of UIO_MAXIOV definition?
In-Reply-To: <20010526205509.A14824@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20010526205509.A14824@FreeBSD.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

<<On Sat, 26 May 2001 20:55:09 -0700, John <jwd@FreeBSD.ORG> said:

>    The second question I have is more standards based.
> Should we consider changing UIO_MAXIOV to IOV_MAX or
> _XOPEN_IOV_MAX and deprecating the 1st? I am unclear
> on what the standard is for this.

UIO_MAXIOV is what the kernel is willing to do.  IOV_MAX being
standardized is what should be used by user code.

-GAWollman


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message