From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Dec 21 10:26:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA00521 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 10:26:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from tesla.i-pi.com (tesla.i-pi.com [198.49.217.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA00515 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 10:26:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ingham@tesla.i-pi.com) Received: (from ingham@localhost) by tesla.i-pi.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id LAA01583; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 11:26:43 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <19981221112642.35033@i-pi.com> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 11:26:42 -0700 From: Kenneth Ingham To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Cannot talk on 2nd enet Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.84e Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a FreeBSD 2.2.6 machine running as a router with a PPP link and an ethernet. This all works fine. Now, I want to add a second ethernet. I have tried two enet cards with the same result. At least one of these cards was known to work in a previous machine. The problem is that the router is unable to talk to any of the machines on the second ethernet. I know the hub is good, because machines on it can talk to each other. The link light on the hub and card light, indicating that I likely have a good cable and connection. Pinging from a host on the 2nd enet to the router or from the router to a host gives ``host is down'' messages. The address space for the two enets on the router are split class C addrs (25 bits of network, 7 of host). ifconfig of the 2 enet cards gives: ie0: flags=8a43 mtu 1500 inet 198.49.217.129 netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast 198.49.217.255 ether 00:aa:00:a8:cd:19 de0: flags=8a43 mtu 1500 inet 198.49.217.4 netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast 198.49.217.127 inet 198.49.217.16 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 198.49.217.16 ether 00:00:f8:01:80:c6 media: autoselect (10baseT/UTP) status: active ie0 is the enet card on the new net. de0 works fine and machines route through it with no problems. netstat -rn shows: Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 198.59.115.109 UGSc 84 11630 ppp0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 12 370 lo0 129.121 198.59.115.109 UGc 0 0 ppp0 140.222 198.59.115.109 UGc 0 0 ppp0 192.160.121 198.59.115.109 UGc 0 0 ppp0 198.49.44 198.59.115.109 UGc 0 0 ppp0 198.49.217.0 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 0 1 de0 => 198.49.217/25 link#1 UC 0 0 198.49.217.3 0:20:af:3f:7c:d6 UHLW 0 261 de0 622 198.49.217.4 127.0.0.1 UH 9 5530 lo0 198.49.217.6 0:a0:24:5f:c9:dc UHLW 0 386 de0 872 198.49.217.9 link#1 UHLW 1 1 198.49.217.10 8:0:69:7:60:2 UHLW 4 11703 de0 1025 198.49.217.16/32 link#1 UC 0 0 198.49.217.127 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 0 1 de0 198.49.217.128/25 link#3 UC 0 0 198.49.217.129 0:aa:0:a8:cd:19 UHLW 0 1 lo0 198.49.217.255 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 0 1 ie0 198.59.115/25 198.59.115.109 UGc 2 12 ppp0 198.59.115.109 198.49.217.4 UH 97 0 ppp0 199.89.16 198.59.115.109 UGc 0 0 ppp0 204.29.236 198.59.115.109 UGc 0 0 ppp0 204.134.1 198.59.115.109 UGc 0 0 ppp0 204.134.3 198.59.115.109 UGc 0 0 ppp0 204.134.4/23 198.59.115.109 UGc 0 0 ppp0 204.134.8.128 198.59.115.109 UGH 0 0 ppp0 204.134.9 198.59.115.109 UGc 0 0 ppp0 204.134.10/23 198.59.115.109 UGc 0 0 ppp0 204.134.14 198.59.115.109 UGc 0 0 ppp0 204.134.78/23 198.59.115.109 UGc 0 0 ppp0 206.29.128/23 198.59.115.109 UGc 0 0 ppp0 208.25.221 198.59.115.109 UGc 0 0 ppp0 Suggestions about how to get the router talking on the 2nd enet? -- Kenneth Ingham ingham@i-pi.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message